[squeak-dev] Give debuggers more space ... :-)

Marcel Taeumel marcel.taeumel at hpi.de
Wed Oct 23 12:47:31 UTC 2019


> Personally, I find the old version "[] in Class >> #selector" much better to read.

Hmm, yes, but that prefix would be hidden for long class names and narrow windows.

> And how would you handle nested, nested, nested blocks?

"[][][][][]..." ;-)

Best,
Marcel
Am 23.10.2019 14:39:41 schrieb Thiede, Christoph <christoph.thiede at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de>:
Personally, I find the old version "[] in Class >> #selector" much better to read. And how would you handle nested, nested, nested blocks? ;-) In this case, I think a preference for "enable/disable modern debugger layout" would be useful.

However, the column alignment is a cool thing. Did you consider aligning the columns at the left and right border rather than centering them?

Best,
Christoph
Von: Squeak-dev <squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org> im Auftrag von Taeumel, Marcel
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2019 14:02:09
An: John Pfersich via Squeak-dev
Betreff: Re: [squeak-dev] Give debuggers more space ... :-)
 
> How will it look with long class names (or two of them)?


Okay-ish.... Not sure about that "[ ] in" ... it might deserve an extra column in the middle:


Best,
Marcel
Am 17.10.2019 20:24:02 schrieb Jakob Reschke <forums.jakob at resfarm.de>:
How will it look with long class names (or two of them)?

Am Mi., 16. Okt. 2019 um 12:57 Uhr schrieb Marcel Taeumel <marcel.taeumel at hpi.de [mailto:marcel.taeumel at hpi.de]>:


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20191023/b1bbed23/attachment.html>


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list