Well, then such compatibility fixes should rather happen in Squeak5.3beta. :-)
Am 05.09.2019 10:49:14 schrieb Tobias Pape <das.linux at gmx.de>:

> On 05.09.2019, at 10:43, Marcel Taeumel wrote:
>
> Hi, all.
>
> Should all be fixed in Trunk now. Load it like this:
>
> Installer ss
> project: 'MetacelloRepository';
> addPackage: 'ConfigurationOfRefactoringTools';
> install.
> (Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfRefactoringTools) project load: '2.0'.
>
> The #stable symbolic version will work only after the release because Metacello matches "alpha" versions to previous versions. So 'squeak5.3.x' and 'squeak5.2.x' will match to "Squeak5.3alpha". .... -.-"
>

Yea, I wrote that ;P


> Best,
> Marcel
>> Am 03.09.2019 06:56:26 schrieb tim Rowledge :
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 2019-09-02, at 8:31 PM, Chris Muller wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Tim,
>> >
>> > As a general point I'd like to throw down a (small) marker for the idea of incorporating the Refactoring tools in the standard image. We make a big deal of the importance of refactoring code and the way that Smalltalk's tools help do that, but quite a few important refactoring actions are pretty tricky in the standard tools. I'd argue that the integration of the refactoring tools (the menus particularly) could be improved, but still.
>> >
>> > Even though I love and use the refactoring tools for development, they bring too much "weight" to the image and IDE for new and general, non-developer users. In particular, it adds quite a few extra menu entries which are of only interest to developers doing development. It's 10X easier for a developer to load the package than for a anyone to unload. -1
>>
>> I have considerable sympathy for your view, really. I suspect - based on a fairly quick scan of the code, nothing more - that quite a lot could be removed by integrating better into the core of Squeak. There seem to be plenty of classes duplicating extant functionality, at a guess as part of making the code fit many systems. And the integration into the browser menus is, frankly, horrible. Then again, there are *already* way too many poorly thought out menu entries in the browsers. I wish we had the resources to provide the refactoring assistance in a cleaner, better integrated, manner
>>
>> tim
>> --
>> tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
>> You never really learn to swear until you learn to drive in Silicon Valley
>>
>>
>>
>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20190905/c99cb46a/attachment.html>