I am in the same position of Christoph,

I found some little bugs here and there. I see that that dev mailing 
list just in a few hours produced a lot of traffic. I doubt I can keep 
it under control.

If Mantis is not used anymore I will post here but I will loose trace of 
them.

extra note. I used Bugzilla (Mantis equivalent I guess) to report bugs 
in for different parts of FreeBSD software and/or documentation. It 
works well. It enables the user (non dev) to give his contribution into 
spotting bugs. It warns the bugs is there for other users to be aware 
of, till it gets solved.

bye
Nicola







On 9/9/19 2:08 AM, Thiede, Christoph wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
>
> thank you for clarification. I have collected a list of miscellaneous 
> minor bugs in Squeak. So when I am going to report them, I will send 
> them to squeak-dev, and if no one reacts on it, I will enter them into 
> Mantis? :)
>
>
> Btw, do bugs refering to SqueakMap packages (such as RefactoringTools) 
> also belong into this mailing list/bugs.squeak.org 
> <http://bugs.squeak.org>?
>
>
> Best,
>
> Christoph
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Von:* Squeak-dev <squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org> im 
> Auftrag von David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com>
> *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 8. September 2019 23:48:38
> *An:* The general-purpose Squeak developers list
> *Betreff:* Re: [squeak-dev] The Inbox: Tools-ct.881.mcz
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 07:21:48PM +0000, Thiede, Christoph wrote:
> > For follow-up: This should also resolve 
> http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7873 
> <http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7873>.
> >
> >
> > Btw: Are we still using this bugtracker system seriously (with the
> > latest time stamps in mind)? Is it worth reporting any bug there instead
> > of mailing it to the list directly? :)
>
> The bugs.squeak.org Mantis tracker does not get much use any more,
> mainly because we do try to resolve things when possible directly
> through inbox/trunk. But this does (too often) lead to good improvements
> that rot in the inbox.
>
> In my opinion, the Mantis tracker remains useful for:
>
> 1) Issues that require input or review from several people who may
> not all be paying attention to the mailing list at the same time.
>
> 2) Issues that are being overlooked or ignored on the mailing list.
>
> 3) Historical record of old issues.
>
> I think it is great that you linked back to Patrick's issue #7833
> that he entered almost a year ago. And as soon as the fix that you
> provided in Tools-ct.881.mcz is merged in trunk we should close
> Mantis #7833.
>
> :-)
>
> Dave
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20190909/400fbe08/attachment.html>