> But I agree that these are no nice solutions at all. I suppose the point 
> is that in contrast to literal bindings, temporary variables are never 
> actually stored as bindings in the block method. For what purpose do you 
> need the bindings?

For inspection - I would like the var names to appear in the explorer as 
the keys (instead of the #basicAt: indexes).

The code I am dealing with at the moment is choke-full of nested blocks, 
and it is a pain to see the values of the temp vars in the closures. I 
am hacking a modified Explorer to better display this particular info, 
but I'm having a hard time...

Stef