>
>
> So, back to my "problem", it looks like I'm safe to write:
>
>       Dictionary new: runtimeVar
>
> and, no matter what size, there will never be a performance hit over
> Dictionary new.  Whew!
>


The above is only true with what's currently in trunk.  With
Collections-ul.867, there is still the case for

     Dictionary new

vs

     Dictionary new: 3

I hope I'm not missing something again, but because of that I think we
should revert your change to HashedCollection class>>#sizeFor:, which is
what this new Collections-cmm.870 with uuid
c4bf7594-c44e-4d02-9956-2b727d2eb75b does (argh, forgot to up the version
#, oh well).

 Best,
  Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20200104/409bd7be/attachment.html>