> On 2020-03-04, at 3:54 PM, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Chris,
> it was just dumb agnostic copy for my concern.
> If the changes were good enough for 5.2, then they should be in 5.3 history too (too late, say 6.0 now).
> But you are probably right, fixing > working around.

Absolutely, which is why my changes pointed out that a proper solution was needed as soon as possible. But we had this discussion back whenever anyway.


tim
--
tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
Fractured Idiom:- MAZEL TON - Lots of luck