+1

/————————————————————/
For encrypted mail use jgpfersich at protonmail.com
Get a free account at ProtonMail.com
Web: https://objectnets.net and https://objectnets.org
https://datascilv.com https://datascilv.org


> On Mar 23, 2020, at 02:39, Fabio Niephaus <lists at fniephaus.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> I don't want to keep you from contributing to Squeak, but I'm not sure
> if adding convenience methods like this is a good idea. Why? I have
> lots of such methods myself (some of them I even got from others). But
> as long as they have no senders/purpose in the image, it pretty much
> just means:
> 
> a) they are hard to discover and to keep up-to-date,
> b) everyone has to maintain everyone's convenience methods (e.g in
> case Context>>#runSimulated ever changes),
> and c) at some point, we may have users relying on (the wrong) API
> which should not be used in production.
> 
> I have a set of personal packages in which I keep things like this.
> What do you think?
> 
> Fabio
> 
>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 8:25 PM <commits at source.squeak.org> wrote:
>> 
>> A new version of Kernel was added to project The Inbox:
>> http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Kernel-ct.1320.mcz
>> 
>> ==================== Summary ====================
>> 
>> Name: Kernel-ct.1320
>> Author: ct
>> Time: 22 March 2020, 8:25:11.31556 pm
>> UUID: d08c3179-cda9-2944-b692-9ef1b00d7742
>> Ancestors: Kernel-eem.1319
>> 
>> Proposal: Add convenience method #runSimulated to BlockClosure. While this should not be used in production, it can be helpful for exploring and testing the simulation machinery.
>> 
>> =============== Diff against Kernel-eem.1319 ===============
>> 
>> Item was added:
>> + ----- Method: BlockClosure>>runSimulated (in category 'system simulation') -----
>> + runSimulated
>> +
>> +       ^ Context runSimulated: self!
>> 
>> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20200324/b8b92af3/attachment.html>