Good idea, absolutely.  My plans for the revamp are initially for a new
backend that provides a simple API that will eventually enable both a web
AND new ToolBuilder interface.

 - Chris

On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 4:34 AM K K Subbu <kksubbu.ml at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 18/05/20 5:22 am, Chris Muller wrote:
> > The head version is the developers version.  When developers intending
> > to work on a package see this message, they already know about potential
> > compatibility issues.  The message is correct.  If it feels alarming, it
> > means you should select the one listed under the "safely-available"
> filter.
>
> When you revamp the code later, could you also reword the message to
> make this explicit? Perhaps something like,
>
> "The package you are about to install has not yet been tested for
> compatibility with your image version (Squeak 5.2). You may want to
> select from the packages listed under "safely-available" filter.
> Do you still want to proceed with the install?"
>
> Regards .. Subbu
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20200518/4d768474/attachment.html>