Hi Mariano,

That is interesting to hear, thank you!

What is VA Smalltalk's stance about Tonel interoperability between the
Smalltalks _in the same project_? For example, if the main developers
use VA Smalltalk, there will be the additional ENVY properties for
SubApplications and such in the meta files. But when someone loads the
project in Squeak or Pharo and writes another version, this will not
include these additional properties. So if this person created a pull
request, merging it without manual polishing will "destroy" the
additional setup for VA Smalltalk.

I am asking because we are facing similar problems between Squeak and
Pharo, although they are still much closer to one another than VA
Smalltalk is to any of them.

Kind regards,
Jakob

Am Fr., 29. Mai 2020 um 21:22 Uhr schrieb Mariano Martinez Peck
<marianopeck at gmail.com>:
>
> Hi Tom,
> That looks great. We have also added Tonel support [1] for VA Smalltalk so it's nice to see more and more adoption.
>
> Excellent work Tom,
>
> [1] https://github.com/instantiations/tonel-vast
>
>
>
> On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 11:42 PM Sean P. DeNigris <sean at clipperadams.com> wrote:
>>
>> Beckmann, Tom wrote
>> > We are currently working on improving the support for different
>> > code-serialization formats in Squeak. This includes Tonel
>>
>> Exciting news! Thanks :)
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Cheers,
>> Sean
>> --
>> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Squeak-Dev-f45488.html
>>
>
>
> --
> Mariano Martinez Peck
> Email: marianopeck at gmail.com
> Twitter: @MartinezPeck
> LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/mariano-martinez-peck
> Blog: https://marianopeck.wordpress.com/
>