Dear Sumim,
Thank you for your kind words.

The latest version of Loke/BabyIDE written on Squeak3.10.2 is at
https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/5xxgzv7fsp/1
The image is my program repository. It includes some examples of DCI 
programming, Ellen's Personal Programming IDE, Squeak Reverse 
Engineering (SRE), and more.

Best
--Trygve

On 2020-10-02 20:14, masato sumi wrote:
> Dear Trygve,
>
> Thank you for your very long term contribution and efforts.
>
> I'm very sorry that I couldn't help you at all now.
>
> I'm afraid, but could you please make your latest version of 
> Loke/BabyIDE written on Squeak3.10.2 available for future generations 
> of researchers and/or followers?
>
> Anyway, I think your ideas and thoughts should be passed on to future 
> generations as faithfully as we can possible, and I myself will try to 
> make sure that.
>
> Thank you so much and goodbye.
> Please take care of yourself.
>
> --
> sumim
>
> 2020-10-03 0:54 Trygve Reenskaug <trygver at ifi.uio.no 
> <mailto:trygver at ifi.uio.no>>:
>
>     Dear all,
>     I need to use many words to explore why I can't understand current
>     Squeak code. I believe the reason is a profound one, and I hope
>     some of you have the patience to read about it.
>
>     Thank you for your responses to my 'A Sad Day'-message. One
>     response said
>      "/But please don't give up as an inventor of MVC, which has
>     simplified writing software for all of us.//
>     //We need new ideas to stabilize Smalltalk."
>
>     /As to MVC, it was received with acclamation when I first
>     presented it at PARC in 1978, and people suggested I should make
>     it the theme of my article in the special Smalltalk issue of Byte.
>     I couldn't understand it; MVC was so simple and obvious that is
>     was not worth writing about it. Nevertheless, people seem to have
>     problems understanding MVC. It took me a long time before I
>     gleaned what was going on. The explanation is a deep one, rooted
>     in our different mental paradigms.
>
>     From around 1970, I was working on Prokon, a distributed system
>     for managers in the shipbuilding industry:
>
>          Every manager has their own computer that they use for
>         augmenting their mind. The manager understands their software
>         and ideally writes it themselves. Managers delegate
>         conversations with other managers to their computer's M-to-M
>         network. (Marked with a heavy black line in the figure). I
>         chose "distributed planning with central control" as my
>         example project. Each manager creates a plan for their
>         department, using apps suited to their particular needs. A
>         */distributed algorithm/* ensures consistency across departments.
>
>     I came to PARC in 1978 and could immediately relate to the
>     Smalltalk image with its universe of collaborating objects. Alan's
>     definition of object-orientation fitted my Prokon model: "Thus its
>     semantics are a bit like having thousands and thousands of
>     computers all hooked together by a very fast network."
>
>     MVC prescribes a network of communicating objects. Any object can
>     fill one or more positions in the network as long as it has the
>     required behavior; their classes are irrelevant. It's so simple
>     that it's not worth writing about it.
>
>
>     ====================
>
>     The work on this post was interrupted at this point by an
>     unexpected week in hospital. It gave me quiet days of pondering
>     the futility of what I am doing and I will be terminating my
>     memberships in the Pharo and Squeak mailing lists. I have also
>     deleted most of the old draft of this message and will quickly
>     conclude with two observations:
>
>     1.
>
>
>         The Smalltalk image is a universe of communicating objects. I
>         call it an object computer. It can be seen as the model of an
>         entirely new kind of computer, a model on a level closer to
>         the human mind than the von Neumann model of 1948. The new
>         model is communication-centric and should supersede the
>         ubiquitous CPU-centric model as soon as possible. Working out
>         the details of this idea could make an exciting and disruptive
>         Ph.D. thesis.
>     2.
>
>         Smalltalk is called a programming language. It is a curious
>         one, very different from well-known languages like Java with
>         their syntax and semantics. Smalltalk, as a programming
>         language, does not have the concept of a program. Smalltalk,
>         as a class-oriented language, does not have syntax for the
>         declaration of a class. Smalltalk, as an object-oriented
>         language, can't describe how objects collaborate to achieve a
>         goal. You appear to be happy with this state of affairs, at
>         least, I see no sign of anybody wanting to move on from the
>         unfinished Smalltalk language to a mature development
>         environment. I do not find it satisfactory and it is not
>         acceptable to the intended managers populating the distributed
>         system shown in the first picture. Consequently, I have done
>         something about it as described in my SoSym article "/Personal
>         Programming and the Object Computer./" I am tired of being
>         alone in my endeavors and this ends my work with Squeak and
>         other Smalltalks. I wish you health and happiness wherever you
>         happen to be.
>
>     Trygve
>     Personal programming and the object computer
>     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-019-00768-3
>
>     -- 
>
>     /The essence of object orientation is that objects collaborateto
>     achieve a goal. /
>     Trygve Reenskaug mailto: trygver at ifi.uio.no
>     <mailto:%20trygver at ifi.uio.no>
>     Morgedalsvn. 5A http://folk.uio.no/trygver/
>     N-0378 Oslo http://fullOO.info
>     Norway                     Tel: (+47) 468 58 625
>
>
>

-- 

/The essence of object orientation is that objects collaborateto achieve 
a goal. /
Trygve Reenskaug mailto: trygver at ifi.uio.no <mailto:%20trygver at ifi.uio.no>
Morgedalsvn. 5A http://folk.uio.no/trygver/
N-0378 Oslo http://fullOO.info
Norway                     Tel: (+47) 468 58 625

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20201003/8438f8a0/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kjjbmoogpajdimke.png
Type: image/png
Size: 45740 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20201003/8438f8a0/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cljooepacomafihh.png
Type: image/png
Size: 22069 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20201003/8438f8a0/attachment-0003.png>