> If we're still shipping an early March VM in the 'latest' package then surely the bulid/pacakge setup is broken?

We decided to decouple VM releases from Squeak releases. However, it would be possible to use a somewhat stable, more recent VM just for Trunk builds. See:

http://files.squeak.org/base/Squeak-trunk/

http://files.squeak.org/base/Squeak64-trunk/


Best,
Marcel
Am 23.10.2020 18:38:01 schrieb tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org>:
If we're still shipping an early March VM in the 'latest' package then surely the bulid/pacakge setup is broken?

> On 2020-10-23, at 4:29 AM, Marcel Taeumel wrote:
>
> Hi Timothy.
>
> > Shouldn't the name of the file reflect the date?
>
> No, that date is from the VM bundled in the archive.
>
> Best,
> Marcel
>> Am 23.10.2020 13:14:13 schrieb gettimothy via Squeak-dev :
>>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>>
>> I am downloading the latest trunk image from http://files.squeak.org/trunk/Squeak6.0alpha-20010-64bit/
>>
>> The "last modified" of the linux .zip (and the trailing portion of the name) reads
>>
>>
>> Squeak6.0alpha-20010-64bit-202003021730-Linux.zip
>>
>> 2020-10-22 15:24
>> 35.3M
>> File
>>
>> Shouldn't the name of the file reflect the date?
>>
>> cordially,
>>
>>
>>
>




tim
--
tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
granary - old folks home



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20201023/a6c17cf0/attachment.html>