I mean authorship...

Le jeu. 15 avr. 2021 à 11:50, Nicolas Cellier <
nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> a écrit :

> With the merge commit that would make 3 commits for a single method. My
> plan is to cherry pick the change on top of trunk with proper comment. With
> our tools, ownership is preserved anyway :)
>
> Le jeu. 15 avr. 2021 à 11:05, Marcel Taeumel <marcel.taeumel at hpi.de> a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi Nicolas,
>>
>> ct.1363 depends on ct.1362, the latter being easier to review. Maybe
>> Christoph (ct) can point us to the "request" he mentioned in the message in
>> 1363. Yet, it looks like Eliot (indirectly) approved this already:
>> http://forum.world.st/The-Inbox-Kernel-ct-1362-mcz-tp5124354.html ..? Or
>> at least he planned to look at this.
>>
>> (Let's hope that the words "branch commit" do not hide more dependencies.
>> Not sure what it means here.)
>>
>> Best,
>> Marcel
>>
>> Am 15.04.2021 10:48:09 schrieb Nicolas Cellier <
>> nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com>:
>> Hi all,
>> again a good and difficult to analyze contribution.
>> We mostly send runSimulated:contextAtEachStep: to thisContext, except
>> in one case in base image:
>>
>> MessageTally tallySends: [3.14159 printString]
>>
>> This is effectively broken in trunk, and repaired after applying
>> Kernel-ct.1363.
>> Before I merge this, additional advice is welcome, this is a tough
>> subject, breaking the Debugger would be the last thing we want to do.
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20210415/b533bfe8/attachment.html>