+1
Am 06.12.2021 17:54:31 schrieb christoph.thiede at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de <christoph.thiede at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de>:
Hi,

shall I merge this fix or do you see any problems with the approach? :-)

Best,
Christoph

---
Sent from Squeak Inbox Talk [https://github.com/hpi-swa-lab/squeak-inbox-talk]

On 2020-02-08T15:57:27+01:00, leves at caesar.elte.hu wrote:

> On Fri, 7 Feb 2020, David T. Lewis wrote:
>
> >
> > Better to try it with flush rather than sync. On Windows, sqFileSync() just
> > calls sqFileFlush(() anyway, and the flush does FlushFileBuffers().
>
> Right. It seems to be not possible to force changes to the physical disk
> on windows. And flush technically does the same as reopen on these
> platforms.
> So yes, flush is the better choice with an additional comment about the
> method not really forcing those files to the disk.
>
> Levente
>
> >
> > Dave
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20211207/186cd34c/attachment.html>