Hi Christoph,

I have no objection.  I'd like it if Context>>tempNamed:[put:] were in
*Tools-Debugger-accessing rather than accessing. But other than that it
looks good to me.

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 8:40 AM Christoph Thiede <
christoph.thiede at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> please forgive me for pushing this proposal again after 13 months :-)
>
> Three questions here for everyone to answer:
>
> 1. What do you think about the proposal in general? Is it worth merging it
> into the Trunk? (Personally, I like to use it nearly every day ...)
> 2. If you have no objections, what keeps us from merging it? :-)
> 3. Naming battle: #tempNamed:[put:] vs #tempVarNamed:[put:]?
>
> Side note: If we get this into Trunk, we can also use it in Compiler to
> produce more comprehensible #DoItIn: methods, for instance, "(ThisContext
> tempNamed: 'failBlock') value" instead of "(ThisContext namedTempAt: 2)
> value" - provided that sources are available.
>
> Best,
> Christoph
>
>
>
> -----
> Carpe Squeak!
> --
> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Squeak-Dev-f45488.html
>
>

-- 
_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20210201/a9c79806/attachment.html>