[squeak-dev] Collections/Streams | About enumerating a sequence up to a matching query ...
Thiede, Christoph
Christoph.Thiede at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de
Thu Mar 11 09:48:05 UTC 2021
-1 :-)
For the same reason why I argued against #do:upThrough: - the order of arguments would be confusing. We would first check to stop, and then do any collect/select operations.
Best,
Christoph
________________________________
Von: Squeak-dev <squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org> im Auftrag von Jaromir Matas <m at jaromir.net>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. März 2021 08:33:38
An: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
Betreff: Re: [squeak-dev] Collections/Streams | About enumerating a sequence up to a matching query ...
To add my 2¢; how about, in the spirit of the pidgin English tradition:
aCollection
collect: [:x | x squared]
selecting: #even
stopIf: [:x | x squared = 2500]
complemented by:
aCollection
collect: [:x | x squared]
selecting: #even
stopBefore: #isNil
-----
^[^ Jaromir
--
Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Squeak-Dev-f45488.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20210311/11edc409/attachment.html>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|