On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:10:22PM +0200, Levente Uzonyi wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2021, David T. Lewis wrote:
> 
> >On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 11:13:37AM -0500, Jaromir Matas wrote:
> >>Hi, 
> >>great!
> >>
> >>Would it be a bad idea to have milliseconds instead (or on top) of
> >>milliSeconds? Etc.
> >>
> >
> >I would not want to bother with that. It would just add more stuff
> >to the API, and the existing selector names are good enough.
> 
> I find the existing names annoying. I think the author of those 
> methods was not familiar with the SI system.
>

I have no strong opinion one way or the other. It's a bit of aggrivation
to manage the deprecation process, but aside from that I guess there
is no reason not to fix the selector names. Should we do that?

Dave