Hi Marcel, could you maybe share some practical examples for #allIn:? I know that many people dislike #in:, too, as it can be used as just another dubious dispatch ...


Best,

Christoph

________________________________
Von: Squeak-dev <squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org> im Auftrag von commits at source.squeak.org <commits at source.squeak.org>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Oktober 2021 13:27:06
An: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
Betreff: [squeak-dev] The Inbox: Collections-mt.961.mcz

A new version of Collections was added to project The Inbox:
http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Collections-mt.961.mcz

==================== Summary ====================

Name: Collections-mt.961
Author: mt
Time: 27 October 2021, 1:27:04.102238 pm
UUID: ff529f7f-b6c8-da48-91cf-201db580c537
Ancestors: Collections-eem.960

Propose addition of #allIn:. See comment. Please review and discuss.

=============== Diff against Collections-eem.960 ===============

Item was added:
+ ----- Method: Array>>allIn: (in category 'accessing') -----
+ allIn: aBlock
+        "Use the receivers contents as arguments for aBlock. Truncate not needed arguments, fill in missing ones with nil. Similar to #groupsDo: for single block invocation. Use it to avoid nested calls of #in:.
+
+        Note that this is implemented here in Array to allow its use only in literal arrays."
+
+        ^ aBlock valueWithEnoughArguments: self!


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20211027/ddc8bb8a/attachment.html>