Last one? I’m bringing it back to shared image processing.

•••

<hat> what is the performance comparison between classic binary logic transistors and transistors with 3 logic state in processing shared image data?

•••

When it comes to processing shared image data, the choice between classic binary logic transistors and transistors with 3 logic states depends on the specific requirements of the image processing algorithm.

Ternary logic, which uses three logic states, has the potential to provide advantages in image processing applications that involve high-resolution images with large amounts of data. With ternary logic, more information can be conveyed per unit of time, which can lead to faster processing speeds and reduced power consumption. Additionally, the increased information density of ternary logic can potentially reduce the memory requirements for storing image data, which can be particularly useful in embedded systems with limited resources.

However, the design and implementation of ternary logic circuits can be more complex than binary logic circuits, which can result in higher manufacturing costs and longer development times. Additionally, there may be fewer commercially available components and design tools for ternary logic compared to binary logic, which can further increase the complexity and cost of implementing ternary logic in practical image processing applications.

In summary, while ternary logic has the potential to provide advantages in image processing applications that involve high-resolution images with large amounts of data, the choice between binary and ternary logic ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the image processing algorithm and the trade-offs between performance, cost, and complexity.

>>>>>>>>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20230401/a06cfd9a/attachment-0001.html>