<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: 3.2 gamma handoff</title></head><body>
<div>At 3:53 PM -0700 7/3/02, Tim Rowledge wrote:</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>> If *anybody* out there has used
3.2gamma4 and has any experiences to<br>
> report, positive or negative or neutral, I would really
appreciate<br>
> hearing from you -- off-list is fine, unless there are issues
worth<br>
> bringing to the attention of the mailing list.<br>
Err, I hadn't even noticed such a release, so I haven't even looked
at</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>it...</blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div>Hi Tim,</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Gamma4 replaced gamma3 on the server earlier this week, after it
was discovered that gamma3 had an unusually nasty bug which could
destroy the image any time a snapshot was made.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>The thread concerning this -- which you probably *did* notice --
was titled "<font face="Times New Roman" color="#000000">URGENT
WARNING -- Don't snapshot! (was: "What is this
error?")"</font>, and the gamma4 announcement came out
day-before-yesterday:</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/squeak/message/46415</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Cheers,</div>
<div><br></div>
<div> -- Scott</div>
</body>
</html>