<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: [ANN] Cash For Documentation
project</title></head><body>
<div>To the harvesters (or anyone who actually controls the content of
Squeak),</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>What is the best way to get a large number of class comment
changes approved?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><font color="#551A8B"><u>http://sqdb.squeak.info</u></font><font
color="#000000"> seems to be a nice attempt but there are no changes
after the initial flurry of interest and it is not clear that any
changes here will actually end up in Squeak anyway. </font></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><font
color="#551A8B"><u>http://www.squeakdoc.org</u></font><font
color="#000000"> seems to have had very little activity</font>. Also
it is not obvious that anything added to this site will actually make
it into Squeak.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Cash for Documentation (http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/2653)
seems to be lifeless. More $ interest in enhancements than in
documentation. And it has no procedures or directions for
actually making the changes - even if you wanted to do them for
free.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Are there comment guidelines somewhere? The present
comments look awful in Dandelion because it must do a <pre>
around them to maintain any formatting that does exist which results
in very, very long lines. Is Dandelion even accepted as a good
way to browse (i.e., would comments formatted for Dandelion be
accepted by the Squeak Browser lovers?).</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Jack</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<x-sigsep><pre>--
</pre></x-sigsep>
</body>
</html>