<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Tim Rowledge wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid2a62ee784d.rowledge@Gravious.telus.net" type="cite">
  <pre wrap="">"Jon Paynter" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:kittle@mail.yans.net">&lt;kittle@mail.yans.net&gt;</a> wrote:

  </pre>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <pre wrap="">Wilkes Joiner
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wilkes.blogspot.com">http://wilkes.blogspot.com</a>
      </pre>
    </blockquote>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap=""><!---->Some neat stuff but the ROTFLMAO bit was
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.devx.com/DevX/Article/26776/0/page/1">http://www.devx.com/DevX/Article/26776/0/page/1</a>
Somebody please fire the ClueGun at this guy.

tim
  </pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Sounds like that guy's idea of OOP is Java and C++, and probably
especially C++.&nbsp; And if C++ is his definition/experience of OOP, then I
think his article is actually quite accurate (at least, as much of it
as I took time out to read).<br>
<br>
Nevin<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>