<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Yep. I totally agree. Simply coloring oll the text and list panes in the tools to white is already an incredible improvement and - I think - very easy to realize.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR><B><I>Chris Schreiner <chris.schreiner@online.no></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">This LookEnhancement; what a pleasant changeset :-)<BR><BR>Stéphane Ducasse skrev:<BR><BR>> Hi all<BR>><BR>> I was at Lugano and I did yet another squeak demo to young <BR>> programmers, they were impressed<BR>> but after they show me what they were doing in Java and ....I was <BR>> impressed by the quality of the look<BR>> of their applications and I thought that if we do not do anything <BR>> about look we should not say that we want to have more squeakers but <BR>> keep playing between us. So does anybody wants that Squeak can talk <BR>> with young programmer of 2000?<BR>><BR>> I would really like that Squeak out of the box look improves.<BR>> Here is what I suggest, we have different possibilities<BR>><BR>> - (1) either load a skin package and use a nice skin<BR>> - (2) load the LookEnhancement available at<BR>>
MCHttpRepository<BR>> location: 'http://squeak.saltypickle.com/LookEnhancements'<BR>> user: ''<BR>> password: ''<BR>> This package is doing a lot of overrides so we cannot load it <BR>> simply in 3.9<BR>> and it would be better to have it inside the image.<BR>> - (3) speed the changes of diego<BR>><BR>> - (4) Do a competition of the better look for squeak<BR>> -- here the criteria should be that the system should be cool<BR>> -- responsive<BR>> -- as less intrusive as possible<BR>><BR>><BR>> Stef<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><p>__________________________________________________<br>Do You Yahoo!?<br>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <br>http://mail.yahoo.com