<html>
<body>
I wish I had the first paragraph from the old site, but other than that,
I think the new site is a better presentation for Squeak to the
uninitiated. <br><br>
The old (current) site uses <pre>Times New Roman as a default font. TNR
is a retched, hard to read font that was designed to cram as much
information in as small a space as possible (for the New York Times
newspaper), something you needn't worry about of a web page.
I agree that new site's font defaults of Verdana ( boring),
Arial (even worse), and Helvetica are almost as bad as using Comic Sans.
How about a readable serif font for the body text? I know it's not
"modern", but serif fonts are MUCH easier to read than sans
serif ones. I happen to like Palatino, but there's lots of other
distinctive fonts out there.
</pre>And by the way, specifying font sizes in pixels is just plain
bogus, it's too small for all other platforms than Windoze, especially
when using screen sizes greater than 800x600.<br><br>
At 09:09 AM 7/2/2005 -0400, John Pierce wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>Hi Stephane,<br><br>
I most definitely am interested in getting bug reports or comments on our
LookEnhancements. I will remedy as soon as practical.<br><br>
Thanks,<br><br>
John<br><br>
On 7/2/05, <b>stéphane ducasse</b>
<<a href="mailto:ducasse@iam.unibe.ch">ducasse@iam.unibe.ch</a>>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>Hi john<br><br>
do you want that I send you some problems I see with your style?<br>
For example the color of the instance/class button selection is<br>
difficult to distinguish<br>
Then with monticello I get the buttons of the following widgets strange.
<br><br>
<br><br>
<br><br>
I hope this will help you making your style better.<br><br>
<br>
Stef<br><br>
</blockquote><br><br>
<br>
-- <br>
It's easy to have a complicated idea. It's very very hard to have a
simple idea. -- Carver Mead </blockquote></body>
</html>