Well, since Keymapping is also used by Romain's services (I think, but probably we should ask him), and services are already part of the image, I would add Keymapping and not Keybinder. Once keymapping is in place one could re-write the window switcher to use a keybinding from keymapping. All the other features of KeyBinder are already present in keymapping.
<br><br>For 3.10 I would vote to add the required modifications to the squeak's event mechanism in the squeak core so further packages could be developed without relying on custom modifications to the event's core. <br><br>
Regards,<br>Hernán<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/14/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Damien Cassou</b> <<a href="mailto:damien.cassou@laposte.net">damien.cassou@laposte.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hernan Tylim a écrit :<br>> Hi.<br>><br>> I saw on the web page that KeyBinder might be part of the image so I<br>> just wanted to warn that KeyBinder does a very subtle hack, but a hack<br>> nevertheless, to the key event mechanism in order to trap the key-bindings.
<br>><br>> This warning is because if someone would want to install another<br>> keybinding mechanism , like keymapping I guess, it might mest something<br>> up, but don't know for sure, didn't test it.<br><br>
So, what should I do ? KeyBinder is very cool for switching between<br>windows and other things like this. Does one of you have an opinion ?<br><br>Thank you for pointing this<br><br>--<br>Damien Cassou<br><br><br></blockquote>
</div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Saludos,<br>Hernán<br>