As I have understood, there is a new eToy implementation in progress inside Tweak.<br>We can wait until this implementation is a bit stable.<br>When this will be true, the other part depending from eToy1 will be able to migrate to eToy2.
<br>After that we can start to deliver an official squeak distribution with eToy2 and eToy1 side by side.<br>Then after w ahile we can start to evict eToy1.<br><br>This will save some efforts, at cost of a bit larger image (but avoiding some hours of work can be a good exchange ;)
<br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/18/06, <b class="gmail_sendername"><a href="mailto:jvuletich@dc.uba.ar">jvuletich@dc.uba.ar</a></b> <<a href="mailto:jvuletich@dc.uba.ar">jvuletich@dc.uba.ar</a>> wrote:
</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Of course.<br><br>That's why I'm asking the Board to decide, or advice.<br><br>Cheers,
<br>Juan Vuletich<br><br>> As Juan wrote, removing Etoys from Morphic while keeping it both<br>> loadable and functioning properly is futile.<br>><br>> So either you leave it in, or you consciously give up compatibility
<br>> with anyone using Etoys now, like the squeakland distribution, OLPC<br>> distribution, Smalland, the Spanish LinEx version, the Japanese<br>> Nihongo version etc. Already synchronizing Squeakland and 3.8 was
<br>> hard, nobody has tried yet for 3.9, but this would make it outright<br>> impossible.<br>><br>> I'm *not* saying you should not do this, but please be aware of the<br>> possible consequences.<br>><br>
<br><br><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>"Just Design It" -- GG<br>Software Architect<br><a href="http://www.objectsroot.com/">http://www.objectsroot.com/</a>