<html>
<head>
<style>
P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 14:53:14 +0300<br>> From: siguctua@gmail.com<br>> To: squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org<br>> Subject: Re: Support of algebraic operations on dictionaries (was: ... sets)<br>><br>> Another example of breaking protocol rules. Do you see any practical<br>> and good use in overriding #do: in Dictionary to iterate through list<br>> of values instead of associations by default? I don't. I'm serious.<br><br><br>Well, if one views a Dictionary as an Array type collection that just happens to use something other then numbers as the index, then one would expect #do: to operate on the values as it does with other indexable collections.<br><br /><hr />Make every IM count. Download Windows Live Messenger and join the i’m Initiative now. It’s free. <a href='http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=TAGWL_June07' target='_new'>Make it count!</a></body>
</html>