<html>
<head>
<style>
P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
> To: squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org<br>> From: craig@netjam.org<br>> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 13:36:30 -0700<br>> Subject: re: Contributors Agreement signature status?<br>> <br>> I'm mostly a technocrat: I want to put my effort into the<br>> technology I think is most effective. Do you have a similar mindset? Is<br>> there something about Spoon that you think is lacking? Are we dealing<br>> with technical issues, or political ones, or something else? It's not<br>> clear to me why, apparently, we're working at cross purposes.<br><br>Just as an observer from the side, isn't it the case that Pavel is trying the make the smallest possible code base *with current Squeak* while you are making lots of modifications to how the environment itself works? And if that's the case, would they still be cross purposes? I would see it more as "low hanging fruit" (so to speak) vs. "the whole shabang", no?<br><br /><hr />Don't get caught with egg on your face. <a href='http://club.live.com/chicktionary.aspx?icid=chick_wlmailtextlink' target='_new'>Play Chicktionary! </a></body>
</html>