<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/4/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jason Johnson</b> <<a href="mailto:jason.johnson.081@gmail.com">jason.johnson.081@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On 9/18/07, <a href="mailto:goran@krampe.se">goran@krampe.se</a> <<a href="mailto:goran@krampe.se">goran@krampe.se</a>> wrote:<br>><br>> This reasoning makes no real sense to me. Why would multiple levels be<br>
> "better"? Are we afraid of running out of namespace names? IMHO the<br>> proliferation of namespaces and hierarchies of them in other languages<br>> (like Java) is more based on the fact that they are used for
<br>> organisational purposes.<br><br>Well my reasoning is simple: we have effectively a flat namespace<br>now, and it doesn't seem to be enough. If we add just one more level<br>then we increase our scale by quite a bit but you still have the
<br>siltation like:</blockquote><div><br><br><snip><br><br>If there was anything important in the rest of your email, could you summarise it for me? I'm not going to read the whole thing.<br><br>Gulik.<br></div>
<br></div>-- <br><a href="http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg">http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg</a><br><a href="http://gulik.pbwiki.com/">http://gulik.pbwiki.com/</a>