Thanks for your quick answer. So, if no one of the current debian guys in this list have any objection, I'm going to fill an ITP to include the vm in Debian. <br>In Extremadura (LinEx) we're working hard to merge our efforts with Debian Edu and one of the main needs is including all the software we're using in our "mother" distribution. So, at least, the vm will be available in a clean Debian Edu or LinEx installation.
<br><br>Cheers<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2007/12/6, Bert Freudenberg <<a href="mailto:bert@freudenbergs.de">bert@freudenbergs.de</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>On Dec 6, 2007, at 18:11 , Andreas Raab wrote:<br><br>> José Luis Redrejo wrote:<br>>> I can see Squeak license is still the never-ending story, but I'm<br>>> not so sure for the vm.<br>><br>> Well, I am. Since less people have touched it we need less people
<br>> to okay the relicensing. Given the usual contributors for VM stuff<br>> (Tim, John, Ian, Bert, David, etc) I'm pretty sure that VMMaker is<br>> de facto already relicensed.<br><br>That's what Ian said, too. The unix VM is purely MIT licensed.
<br><br>- Bert -<br><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>