As a result of this thread, I'm happy to explore an option I didn't
know existed. I've been using Ruby for things that Squeak doesn't do
well or that I don't want to have to manage across all the various
versions of images I use. ... <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 9, 2008 8:02 AM, Paolo Bonzini <<a href="mailto:bonzini@gnu.org">bonzini@gnu.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d"><snip><br></div>Agreed. But taking conclusions from looking at one file rather than,<br>for example, reading the FAQ (e.g. <a href="http://smalltalk.gnu.org/faq/32" target="_blank">http://smalltalk.gnu.org/faq/32
</a> which<br>says "The class library is licensed under the GNU LGPL") is a clear sign<br>of prejudice.</blockquote><div> </div><div>I can see that possibility but it's not unreasonable IMO to expect that GPL applies to everything since there is no clear separation of VM and class library. It might be helpful to somehow emphasize that the VM and library have different licenses - perhaps make that FAQ obvious in the distribution and/or on the front page of the site.
<br><br>Laurence<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br><font color="#888888"><br>Paolo<br><br></font></blockquote></div>
<br>