<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 15, 2008 10:11 PM, Frank Shearar <<a href="mailto:frank.shearar@angband.za.org">frank.shearar@angband.za.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Michael van der Gulik asks:<br><div class="Ih2E3d">Could I get my understanding of the licensing situation verified please:<br><br>Squeak 1.1 was originally released under the Squeak license. It has since<br>been relicensed under the Apache
2.0 license.<br>All changes made since Squeak 1.1 were originally under the Squeak license.<br>All changes made by people who have signed[1] the license agreement [2] are<br>now under the MIT license.<br>All changes made by people who have /not/ signed[3] the license agreement
<br>remain under the Squeak license.<br><br>> So, does this mean that all of Squeak, except the contributions by people<br>who haven't signed the license<br>> agreement, is now (as of Squeak 3.10) released under the Apache
2.0<br>license?<br><br></div>Surely it means that most of Squeak 3.10 ("most" meaning "everything touched<br>by a signatory since Squeak 1.1") is under the MIT licence? (Given that<br><a href="http://netjam.org/squeak/SqueakDistributionAgreement.pdf" target="_blank">
http://netjam.org/squeak/SqueakDistributionAgreement.pdf</a> mentions MIT, not<br>Apache 2.0.)<br><div class="Ih2E3d"><br>> I'm asking this because I'm about to embark on some significant changes to<br>the classes in Kernel and Collections
<br>> for my SecureSqueak project. I want the end result of this work to be<br>released under the Apache 2.0 license, if<br>> possible. These changes are scoped to Kernel, Collections and a handful<br>of other classes.
<br><br></div>If I understand correctly, if you wanted these changes included in the<br>Squeak "core" (whatever that means), the changes would have to be MIT<br>licenced.<br><font color="#888888"></font></blockquote>
<div><br><br>My changes aren't intended for Squeak "core". They are going to be for a fork of Squeak called SecureSqueak (<a href="http://gulik.pbwiki.com/SecureSqueak">http://gulik.pbwiki.com/SecureSqueak</a>
). The changes are a bit too radical to be incorporated into the <a href="http://squeak.org">squeak.org</a> image, and they're guaranteed to be incompatible with every package ever written for Squeak :-).<br><br>Everything I write that's written for Squeak is licensed under the MIT license.
<br><br>Gulik.<br></div></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><a href="http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg">http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg</a><br><a href="http://gulik.pbwiki.com/">http://gulik.pbwiki.com/
</a>