<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Feb 8, 2008 1:32 PM, Yoshiki Ohshima <<a href="mailto:yoshiki@vpri.org">yoshiki@vpri.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">> Yes, the #lowestPriority case would be a problem. The<br>> #lowestPriority would be renamed to #reallyLowestPriority and new<br>> #lowestPriority would return #reallyLowestPriority+1?<br>
><br>> Would you seriously consider changing this in the <a href="http://squeak.org" target="_blank">squeak.org</a> image?<br><br></div> I don't know the right answer to this question. I understand that<br>most of people don't need it and then don't want to have it. OTOH, I<br>
don't mind to have it and that would prevent a few people in the<br>future stumble on the problem...<br><font color="#888888"></font></blockquote><div><br><br>In that case, the lowest priority idle thread needs to be of a lower priority than #reallyLowestPriority, so I propose also adding #actualReallyLowestPriority to be the lowest priority, then #reallyLowestPriority to be #actualReallyLowestPriority+1 and #lowestPriority to be #actualReallyLowestPriority+2.<br>
</div></div><br>Gulik.<br clear="all"><br>-- <br><a href="http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg">http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg</a><br><a href="http://gulik.pbwiki.com/">http://gulik.pbwiki.com/</a>