<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Feb 8, 2008 1:14 PM, Yoshiki Ohshima <<a href="mailto:yoshiki@vpri.org">yoshiki@vpri.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
(Hmm, while I'm writing this, I saw an email from nicolas. Well,<br>what a sychronicity; he also uses the phrase "counter intuitive". But<br>the argument is different somehow... So let me post this anyway...)<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>> Unless I've missed some correction to the patch, the patch isn't<br>> correct. For example, you'll get an "Invalid priority" walkback if you<br>> try to evaluate the following using the patch:<br>
> [[Transcript show: 'works'; cr; flush] fork]<br>> forkAt: Processor lowestPriority<br><br></div> Yes, the #lowestPriority case would be a problem. The<br>#lowestPriority would be renamed to #reallyLowestPriority and new<br>
#lowestPriority would return #reallyLowestPriority+1?<br><font color="#888888"></font></blockquote><div><br><br>Would you seriously consider changing this in the <a href="http://squeak.org">squeak.org</a> image?<br><br>Gulik.<br>
</div></div><br>-- <br><a href="http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg">http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg</a><br><a href="http://gulik.pbwiki.com/">http://gulik.pbwiki.com/</a>