<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Feb 11, 2008 3:16 PM, itsme213 <<a href="mailto:itsme213@hotmail.com">itsme213@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
"Keith Hodges" <<a href="mailto:keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk">keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk</a>> wrote<br><br>> Your suggestion of Documentation classes comes but one month after I<br>> suggested the very same.<br>
<br>Newbie alert .... Why not make package and class-category proper objects<br>with their own documentation? Is it too far-reaching a change? Or would MC<br>not handle them since they are not classes or methods? Do those who know the<br>
Squeak image well think that would be a bad move? Are there some other good<br>reasons to not go that route? All of the above? :-)<br></blockquote><div><br><br>That's what I did when I implemented Namespaces. If you want to play with them, you can load them ("NamespaceTools") from the Universes Browser on a 3.10 image. Note that they're still actively work in progress, incomplete and quite buggy.<br>
</div></div><br>Package has become a proper object, and the class categories have been replaced with Namespace, which are also proper objects.<br><br>I haven't touched method categories at all, but they are also a candidate for refactoring.<br>
<br>Note that MC does not work at all with my implementation.<br><br>Gulik.<br clear="all"><br>-- <br><a href="http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg">http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg</a><br><a href="http://gulik.pbwiki.com/">http://gulik.pbwiki.com/</a>