<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 6:25 AM, Jason Johnson <<a href="mailto:jason.johnson.081@gmail.com">jason.johnson.081@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Wed, Feb 6, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Michael van der Gulik <<a href="mailto:mikevdg@gmail.com">mikevdg@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Er... I can't tell if you're joking or if you're serious.<br>
><br>
> I always write my code under the assumption that some day, in the<br>
> future, some bright spark will write a better VM that will run<br>
> separate Smalltalk Processes on separate OS processes/threads by<br>
> whatever means, thus better utilising multi-cored or multiple CPUs.<br>
><br>
> When that day comes, my code will run faster and your code will break.<br>
<br>
If that pointless day ever comes both your code will break.<br>
Share-state programming is just to complicated for mortals to do right<br>
consistently.<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all">I don't seem to have much trouble with it myself.<br><br>Gulik.<br><br>-- <br><a href="http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg">http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg</a><br>
<a href="http://gulik.pbwiki.com/">http://gulik.pbwiki.com/</a>