<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2008/3/20, Juan Vuletich <<a href="mailto:juan@jvuletich.org">juan@jvuletich.org</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Isn't something like <a href="http://www.jvuletich.org/NiceFonts.html">http://www.jvuletich.org/NiceFonts.html</a> better for<br> OLPC? (and for most Squeak users, btw...)<br> <br> Cheers,<br> <br>Juan Vuletich</blockquote>
<div><br>I've just tried it and the results are really wonderful. Bert said, OLPC does not have sub-pixels, but I've tried it also on an OLPC and it looks much better than the original image. Anyway, I have a some doubts:<br>
- I don't have a CRT monitor, do they look fine at it?<br>- Any trick to generate new size/bold/italic fonts? automatically generated bold fonts look really ugly...<br>- If there is no hidden problem behind this approach, why hasn't it already been implemented in the official images? <br>
<br>Regards.<br>José L.<br><br> </div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Bert Freudenberg wrote:<br> ><br> ><br> > OTOH the OLPC XO's unique display has no sub-pixels, so we do not<br>
> actually want sub-pixel rendering. It's good to include nonetheless,<br> > but we need to make sure not to accidentally enable it when running on<br> > the XO, or if display scaling is enabled.<br> ><br>
> - Bert -<br> ><br> <br> </blockquote></div><br>