<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:50 PM, tim Rowledge <<a href="mailto:tim@rowledge.org">tim@rowledge.org</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><div class="Ih2E3d">On 7-Apr-08, at 12:00 PM, Stephen Pair wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite"><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:31 PM, tim Rowledge <<a href="mailto:tim@rowledge.org" target="_blank">tim@rowledge.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> A key problem with funding is the sheer amount one would need to achieve very much; if we postulate a dozen people (say 10 that do development work, a manager/leader and an admin) you would have to budget around $1.2M a year; increasing steadily as the USD sinks into the mire.</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>Are planning a mission to the moon? There are many things that could be accomplished with a lot less.</div></div></blockquote></div>What, you think I'm not worth 100K a year? </div></div></blockquote>
<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><div> Heh...not exactly what I meant. I meant, you could do useful things on the scale of a few weeks and one or two people.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder">
</div><div>- Stephen</div></div>