On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 9:03 AM, karl <<a href="mailto:karl.ramberg@comhem.se">karl.ramberg@comhem.se</a>> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">Daniel Vainsencher wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Interesting idea. The interesting algorithm in SqP is the flow algorithm that decides when the certifications of a person are sufficient to actually give him the status. That'd probably require adding some Smalltalk code. Also, does the permissions model fit?<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Good point, but do the different certifications mean anything anymore ? I think the model could be that as long as someone approves someone one can vote. So we just need Observer and Certified or something like that.<font color="#888888"></font></blockquote>
<div><br>Well, what is the actual goal of SqP then - just a way to keep track of the "approved" members of the community, and some contact info etc for them?<br><br>If so, I'm happy to build/host something in Dabble DB for that purpose...<br>
<br>Avi<br></div></div>