<div dir="ltr">I'll be happy to move it myself. I've been running it on apache1 behind apache2 through mod_proxy, so the whole thing should simply be copyable to the SqF box. However, there should be some sense of usefulness before I invest the time, of course :). <br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Ken Causey <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ken@kencausey.com">ken@kencausey.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
No I don't think so. The webteam is busy enough with <a href="http://www.squeak.org" target="_blank">www.squeak.org</a>.<br>
Also SqP is not implemented in Squeak at all. SqP is the responsibility<br>
of the box-admins team and we don't have any real need to turn it over<br>
to someone else.<br>
<br>
It's simply the case that if it is going to be maintained then at the<br>
very least it is going to have to be moved, and this is frankly<br>
something of a PITA since it is an old mod_virgule/Apache1.x<br>
application. It can be done certainly, but frankly I don't care to<br>
spend the time doing it if no one cares.<br>
<br>
The site has had very little activity in the last year, in fact only a<br>
dozen people have posted diary entries in that time. Most of the<br>
articles from the last year have been my Roundups or election related<br>
(thanks to Tim for the single real exception).<br>
<br>
I'm not sure keeping it just for the rankings/voters functionality alone<br>
is sufficient reason. The fact is that it doesn't really function for<br>
this purpose either if no one is visiting the site regularly.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Ken<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 16:03 -0400, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:<br>
> It's also the place to register for Squeak Leadership Team Elections.<br>
><br>
> I vote to keep it. Can we turn it over to the Web Team to maintain?<br>
><br>
> Ron Teitelbaum<br>
> Squeak Elections Team Member<br>
><br>
> > -----Original Message-----<br>
> > From: <a href="mailto:squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org">squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:squeak-dev-">squeak-dev-</a><br>
> > <a href="mailto:bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org">bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org</a>] On Behalf Of Ken Causey<br>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 3:17 PM<br>
> > To: Squeak Devel List<br>
> > Cc: Cees de Groot<br>
> > Subject: [squeak-dev] <a href="http://People.squeakfoundation.org" target="_blank">People.squeakfoundation.org</a> still useful?<br>
> ><br>
> > Cees: So we have at most until November 30th to either move, replace,<br>
> > or forget <a href="http://people.squeakfoundation.org" target="_blank">people.squeakfoundation.org</a>?<br>
> ><br>
> > Community: While Cees exaggerates a bit it is the case that only a<br>
> > handful of us are posting to <a href="http://people.squeakfoundation.org" target="_blank">people.squeakfoundation.org</a> lately, and<br>
> > mostly me. Are we, as a community, interested in maintaining this site?<br>
> ><br>
> > Ken<br>
> ><br>
> > On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 20:46 +0200, Cees de Groot wrote:<br>
> > > Guys,<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Just discovered that apparently <a href="http://people.squeakfoundation.org" target="_blank">people.squeakfoundation.org</a> (aka's<br>
> > > Ken's Private Blog ;-)) is still running on my machine, and I canceled<br>
> > > it per 30/11 because I'm hardly using it anymore.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > What shall we do with it?<br>
> > ><br>
> > > TIA,<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Cees<br>
> > ><br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>