<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Keith Hodges <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk">keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">Eliot Miranda wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Keith Hodges<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">> <<a href="mailto:keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk">keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk">keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk</a>>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Eliot Miranda wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Keith Hodges<br>
> > <<a href="mailto:keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk">keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk">keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk</a>><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk">keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk">keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk</a>>>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > Eliot Miranda wrote:<br>
> > > Hi All,<br>
> > ><br>
> > > we're using MC1.5 & I just had cause to reload all my<br>
> > packages in<br>
> > > a fresh image and I've noticed that none of my class<br>
> categories were<br>
> > > moved over. The bug is that the category order exists only<br>
> > implicitly<br>
> > > in the source/<a href="http://source.st" target="_blank">source.st</a> <<a href="http://source.st" target="_blank">http://source.st</a>><br>
> <<a href="http://source.st" target="_blank">http://source.st</a>> <<a href="http://source.st" target="_blank">http://source.st</a>><br>
> > element of the mcz and<br>
> > > doesn't exist at all in the snapshot.bin so when loading<br>
> loads from<br>
> > > snapshot.bin one ends up with some essentially random category<br>
> > order.<br>
> > > Anyone have fixes for this?<br>
> > ><br>
> > Hi Eliot,<br>
> ><br>
> > checking the current MC1.5 it is saving category definitions<br>
> in the<br>
> > snapshot.bin file.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Have you tested that a load of a package containing some large class<br>
> > not currently in your image loads with correct organization?<br>
> (VMMaker<br>
> > is ideal).<br>
> VMMaker-ar.118 loaded in the correct order for me.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Ah, sorry. That's not a good test. The order that you get is the<br>
> order in which methods come in (which might be alphabetical). i.e.<br>
> after the load the first category in your organization will be the<br>
> category of the first method loaded, the second category will be the<br>
> category of the next method not in the first category and so on.<br>
> Since VMMaker-ar.118 has this organization anyway you won't see any<br>
> change.<br>
><br>
> So... reorganize the categories in Interpreter in VMMaker-ar.118 so<br>
> they're e.g. alphabetical, save that and ten load it into a fresh<br>
> image and see what you get.<br>
><br>
</div></div>I am feeling thick... "reorganise the categories in Interpreter"... but<br>
interpreter is only one Category. Are we talking about different things?<br>
<br>
I am beginning to think you are talking about method categories, rather<br>
than class categories.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Uh, yes :)</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Keith<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>