<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [squeak-dev] Re: Statistics on merging Cuis with 3.10 on Morph hierarchy</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 4/17/09 9:58 PM, "Hernan Wilkinson" <hernan.wilkinson@gmail..com> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>I ran the statistics only on the Morph hierarchy because what seems to be faster in Cuis is the UI. I'm assuming that the Cuis changes in the Morph hierarchy is what makes Cuis run faster, but I'm not sure of that... of course we can run the same process for other hierarchies, packages, all the classes, etc. And if somebody is interesting in knowing which classes, methods, etc. are involved (the real stuff, not only the numbers), just let me know.<BR>
<BR>
Hernan.<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><BR>
<BR>
I don’t dig deeper in Cuis, but my bet is Cuis is faster as no TTF fonts.<BR>
What people seems like , the Microsoft look, gives Vista perfomance :=)<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Edgar</SPAN></FONT></FONT>
</BODY>
</HTML>