Hi!<br><br>At least on Linux I can't imagine why people would like the usual Squeak rendering, I may have a problem with Cuis as far as cut&paste is concerned, but it looks 1 million times better as far as fonts are concerned... Together with Opera and Chromium the usual Squeak way it's got the worst fonts rendering ever. Why?<br>
<br>I know nothing about char rendering in general, though. Maybe someone will take a second to explain me why certain things look so poor on *nix?<br><br>Berto<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/4/18 Edgar J. De Cleene <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:edgardec2001@yahoo.com.ar">edgardec2001@yahoo.com.ar</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><font size="4"><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
<br>
I don’t dig deeper in Cuis, but my bet is Cuis is faster as no TTF fonts.<br>
What people seems like , the Microsoft look, gives Vista perfomance :=)<br><font color="#888888">
<br>
<br>
Edgar</font></span></font></font>
</div>
<br></blockquote></div><br>