Hi Keith,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Keith Hodges <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk">keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
The existing community development model works fine enough.<br>
<br>
1. Submit changes as change sets to mantis.<br>
<br>
2. Bob builds and tests the changes in a basic image, a dev image and a<br>
full image<br>
<br>
While you need your changes, and await the release with your fixes<br>
integrated into it, you can load them manually from Mantis.<br>
<br>
3. When Bob builds the new release he automatically loads changesets<br>
from mantis, and fills in the MC repositories together with commit messages.<br>
<br>
The result is an image that looks as though it has been managed with MC,<br>
but the work is submitted in changesets that we all prefer.<br>
<br>
This is an open process, and you can see what is due for inclusion or<br>
not by querying mantis.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I just went to <a href="http://squeak.org">squeak.org</a> and followed community links and I can find no reference to Bob. The things I want to be able to see and find easily are</div>
<div><br></div><div>1. sample images</div><div>2. list of packages loaded in the image</div><div>3. test results (name of class, number of green, yellow and red tests, and if possible the assertion that failed or the error message for each yellow and red test).</div>
<div><br></div><div>How do I get at this kind of info? If I can't get at this then Bob is an abstraction I don't understand and can't trust. If it is manifested then it needs to be findable easily from <a href="http://squeak.org">squeak.org</a>.</div>
<div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Now if certain members of the board would volunteer to contribute to the<br>
process, rather than replacing it without discussion, we would all be a<br>
lot better of.<br>
<br>
best regards<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Keith</font></blockquote><div><br></div><div>best</div><div>Eliot</div><div> </div></div><br>