<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Igor Stasenko <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:siguctua@gmail.com">siguctua@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
Now, Smalltalk == SmalltalkImage current and everyone is happy:<br>
- dictionary lives in separate ivar,<br>
- fat & boring housekeeping stuff lives in SmalltalkImage instance.<br>
<br>
What you think?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I particularly like this idea from the standpoint of delivering a modules that exist within their own context. It is actually not that dissimilar from Forth systems that use different vocabs to support multiple incompatible applications at the same time. </div>
</div><div><br></div><div>Something like this would solve one of the problems I've been running into recently, where some code keeps mucking up the SystemDictionary's associations causing the Compiler to error out. </div>
<div><br></div><div>Dave</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>-- <br>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- <a href="http://blog.dloh.org/">http://blog.dloh.org/</a><br>