<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:17 PM, John Chludzinski <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:john.chludzinski@gmail.com">john.chludzinski@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>> Mariano Martinez Peck marianopeck at <a href="http://gmail.com" target="_blank">gmail.com</a> wrote ...<br></div><div class="im"><div>></div>> The thing is the license with Cygwin. You must attach cygwin dll with your<br>
> program (SqueakVM in this case) :(<br>
> MinGW as the name says, it is smaller and in my case (I did this for OpenDBX<br>> library) it was much more faster than cygwin. Obviously that's if the app<br>> you want to compile doesn't use certain stuff MinGW can handle. And you<br>
<div>> don't depend in any external dll like cygwin.<br></div><div><br></div></div><div>Performance is definitely a consideration (+ whatever licensing issues & including the cygwin.dll) . Do you know how badly (or how well) Cygwin performs v. MinGW? ---John</div>
</blockquote><div><br>I don't know where can be numbers, but that time, I read this: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MinGW#Comparison_with_Cygwin">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MinGW#Comparison_with_Cygwin</a><br>
</div></div><br>