<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Keith Hodges <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk">keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">Bert Freudenberg wrote:<br>
><br>
> On 02.09.2009, at 09:33, Damien Cassou wrote:<br>
><br>
>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Michael van der<br>
>> Gulik<<a href="mailto:mikevdg@gmail.com">mikevdg@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>> Would it perhaps be better to have the automated trunk commit<br>
>>> messages going<br>
>>> to some other dedicated mailing list?<br>
</div>Which we already have.<br>
<div class="im">>> With squeaksource, it is easy to get an RSS feed of a package. That<br>
>> way only people interested get noticed.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Why would people on squeak-dev not be interested in Squeak development?<br>
</div>1. Not having time.<br>
<br>
2. Poluting the exisiting actual human messages with extra stuff to<br>
trawl through when you are searching for something.<br>
<font color="#888888"></font></blockquote><div><br><br>95% of the human messages end up in my trash unread. I'm finding about the same proportion of commit messages are relevant to me as human messages.<br><br>I'm becoming a bit of a fan of the commit messages. You can see what's happening, and it's the best forum for discussing changes.<br>
<br>Gulik.<br><br><br></div></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><a href="http://gulik.pbwiki.com/">http://gulik.pbwiki.com/</a><br>