<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Juan Vuletich <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:juan@jvuletich.org">juan@jvuletich.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">Torsten Bergmann wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
At least there is enough interest shown here to keep all forks closer<br>
and I think Matthew wrote in November he will try to rebase Cobalt atop Pharo. <br>
Maybe Pharo-core is not "core" enough to be the basis for Squeak and other distributions like Cuis, EToys, ... So what is the "basis"?<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
We need to decide if this common core will include an UI framework or not. If the answer is 'yes' then it would be very much like Cuis itself.<div class="im"><br></div>
Please take a close look at Cuis: <a href="http://www.jvuletich.org/Cuis/Index.html" target="_blank">http://www.jvuletich.org/Cuis/Index.html</a> .</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I'll second this...if you haven't looked at Cuis, it is definitely worth the look. Of all the squeak distributions out there, this is probably my favorite. It's small, fast, and gets back to the basics of Smalltalk. I think it would be a good reference point on which to base other distributions.</div>
<div><br></div><div>- Stephen</div><div><br></div></div>