Am I going crazy or wasn't it just over a month ago that it was announced that you <u><b>can</b></u> unload and reload etoys from a trunk image?<br><br><a href="http://n4.nabble.com/Etoys-package-now-un-re-loadable-td997991.html#a998847">http://n4.nabble.com/Etoys-package-now-un-re-loadable-td997991.html#a998847</a><br>
<br clear="all">Mike Hales<br>Engineering Manager<br>KnowledgeScape<br><a href="http://www.kscape.com">www.kscape.com</a><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/3/5 Randal L. Schwartz <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:merlyn@stonehenge.com">merlyn@stonehenge.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
>>>>> "Miguel" == Miguel Enrique Cobá Martinez <<a href="mailto:miguel.coba@gmail.com">miguel.coba@gmail.com</a>> writes:<br>
<br>
Miguel> Then Squeak refuses to remove Etoys from base image, even is in process<br>
Miguel> the update and resync of Etoys with upstream squeakland code.<br>
<br>
I do believe the intent is to make etoys unloadable. If you've heard<br>
otherwise, can you poin at it, so that I can be up to date?<br>
<br>
Miguel> If the board refuses to remove etoys that is for me that they have a<br>
Miguel> preference for the educational use of squeak than the commercial use of<br>
Miguel> squeak.<br>
<br>
As a member of the board, I can tell you this is *not* an intent.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
--<br>
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095<br>
<<a href="mailto:merlyn@stonehenge.com">merlyn@stonehenge.com</a>> <URL:<a href="http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/" target="_blank">http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/</a>><br>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.<br>
See <a href="http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/" target="_blank">http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/</a> for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>