<html><body>
<p>+1<br>
<br>
<br>
Sam S. Adams, IBM Distinguished Engineer, IBM Research<br>
Mobile: 919-696-6064, email: ssadams@us.ibm.com<br>
Asst: Kenndra K. Quiles. (732) 926-2292 Fax: (732) 926-2455, email: Kenndra@us.ibm.com<br>
<<Hebrews 11:6, Proverbs 3:5-6, Romans 1:16-17, I Corinthians 1:10>><br>
<br>
<br>
<tt>squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org wrote on 04/14/2010 09:15:38 AM:<br>
<br>
> Ian Trudel <ian.trudel@gmail.com> </tt><br>
<tt>> Sent by: squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org<br>
> </tt><br>
<tt>> 04/14/2010 09:15 AM</tt><br>
<tt>> <br>
> Please respond to<br>
> The general-purpose Squeak developers list <squeak-<br>
> dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org></tt><br>
<tt>> <br>
> To</tt><br>
<tt>> <br>
> The general-purpose Squeak developers list <squeak-<br>
> dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org></tt><br>
<tt>> <br>
> cc</tt><br>
<tt>> <br>
> Subject</tt><br>
<tt>> <br>
> Re: [squeak-dev] Can i has underscores? :)</tt><br>
<tt>> <br>
> 2010/4/14 Torsten Bergmann <astares@gmx.de>:<br>
> > Couldnt we follow the other Smalltalks who seem to<br>
> > have no problem with it and the good old rule to<br>
> > keep it simple.<br>
> <br>
> Don't we have different priorities as a community than other Smalltalk<br>
> dialects? My point is that we have limited development resources and<br>
> this very specific feature does not add anything other than a<br>
> preference in style. The reward is too little. I vote for a better<br>
> prioritizing of features to be supported. ;)<br>
> <br>
> Ian.<br>
> -- <br>
> <a href="http://mecenia.blogspot.com/">http://mecenia.blogspot.com/</a><br>
> <br>
</tt></body></html>