<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 5/1/10 7:14 PM, Casey Ransberger wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:u2xd3efa6ad1005011914l3ae988c1j7b6f0d17e339d1ab@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">Class comment is:
<div>"The Morphic ui manager."</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This comment is beyond useless. I'm glancing over the methods it
exposes. Looks like it specializes a generic UIManager for morphic...
and there's a similar MVCUIManager, comment is similarly useless.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Ah, the base class has a comment.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>"UIManager is a dispatcher for various UI requests."<br
clear="all">
<br>
</div>
<div>Do I take it the usual way of getting a UIManager is to
send #default to the base class?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thinking I'm going to add (at the least) a note to both
subclasses saying "See the class comment in UIManager for more
information." Technically this is true as it *does* have *slightly*
more information. Then I'm going to mess around with it to get a sense
for what it can do, and then expand the comment some.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Anything folks think I should know about this class before I go
writing damned lies about it? :P</div>
<meta http-equiv="content-type"
content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
<div>-- </div>
</blockquote>
<br>
There's lies. damned lies, and Squeak Documentation...<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Lawson<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>